🤝

Subcontractor Work Verification

Track subcontracted manufacturing work with receiving inspection, quality verification, and integration back into main assembly.

Solution Overview

Track subcontracted manufacturing work with receiving inspection, quality verification, and integration back into main assembly. This solution is part of our Production category and can be deployed in 2-4 weeks using our proven tech stack.

Industries

This solution is particularly suited for:

Aerospace Automotive Manufacturing

The Need

Manufacturers across aerospace, automotive, medical device, and heavy equipment industries depend on subcontractors and outside processors to handle specialized manufacturing operations—welding, heat treatment, plating, machining, casting, forging—that require equipment or expertise not available in-house. Yet managing subcontractor work remains fragmented, opaque, and risky. Purchase orders are issued to subcontractors, work is shipped out, and weeks later materials return with a packing slip indicating "work completed," but the actual work performed, parameters used, and quality of execution remain unknown. Quality managers cannot verify whether critical processes were performed according to specification: Was heat treat executed at the correct temperature and time? Were welds made by certified welders with proper wire and parameters? Were all surface finish specifications met?

The consequences are severe and directly impact product integrity and regulatory compliance. Under AS9100 (aerospace), NADCAP (special processes), and IATF 16949 (automotive) standards, every process applied to materials or components must be documented and traceable, including subcontracted work. Yet most manufacturers lack the visibility to answer basic traceability questions: "Which lots were processed by Vendor X in Q3? What was the specific heat treat recipe applied? Who supervised the work and what certifications did they hold?" When a field failure occurs and root cause analysis points to a subcontracted process, manufacturers discover that work records were either never created or were lost because subcontractors maintained them in paper files or proprietary systems.

The root causes are systemic: subcontractors operate independently with their own quality systems, no standardized data is captured at the subcontractor facility, work orders lack feedback loops, and there is no real-time visibility into process parameters or personnel qualifications. When work completes, there is no automated inspection or verification protocol—items are simply returned with a certificate of completion (if anything). For critical processes, subcontractors may be NADCAP-certified, but documentation of their actual process execution is often missing or inaccessible. Manufacturers bear the compliance risk even though the work was performed elsewhere, creating a gap between control and responsibility that auditors and customers exploit.

The Idea

A Subcontractor Work Tracker creates complete visibility and traceability for all work performed by outside processors and subcontractors, directly addressing the opacity and lost documentation that plague modern supply chains. The system connects a manufacturer's plant floor to subcontractor facilities via a secure supplier portal, enabling real-time work tracking, process parameter documentation, and personnel certification verification—transforming subcontract work from a black box into an auditable, traceable process.

The work order issuance process establishes the foundation for visibility. When a manufacturer needs to send materials for heat treat, plating, welding, or other outside processing, the system generates a work order that includes detailed process requirements, acceptable parameter ranges, required equipment certifications, and required personnel qualifications. The work order is transmitted electronically to the subcontractor's portal with explicit acknowledgment. The subcontractor cannot begin work until the job is formally acknowledged, creating the first control point.

Real-time process parameter capture eliminates the traditional "work completed" mystery. As work is performed, critical process parameters flow directly into the system: temperature and hold time for heat treat, plating bath composition and immersion duration, welding amperage/voltage/wire speed, surface finish measurements, and material chemistry verification. This replaces the historical pattern of subcontractors returning work with only a packing slip and no parameter evidence. The system captures these parameters from connected equipment (furnaces, plating control systems, welding machines) via Bluetooth/WiFi, eliminating manual transcription errors and creating immutable timestamped records at the point of execution.

Operator certification enforcement adds accountability. Before work can begin, the assigned technician's credentials are verified against both external NADCAP/customer-approved databases and the subcontractor's internal certification records. The system logs which certified operator performed the work and documents their qualifications and certifications at the time of execution (not retroactively). Any deviation from process parameters triggers real-time alerts: if heat treat temperature drifts outside specification, both the subcontractor's quality manager and the manufacturer's quality engineer are immediately notified, enabling corrective action while work is in progress rather than after scrap is created. At completion, the subcontractor photographs the finished components and uploads all supporting documentation: material certificates, process execution records, inspection results, and any process deviations or rework with full details.

The receiving inspection process validates completeness and compliance. The manufacturer's receiving inspector uses the mobile app to verify that returned components match the work order, that all required documentation is present, and that process parameters stayed within specification. If documentation is incomplete or parameters are out of spec, the system triggers an automatic quarantine hold: items cannot move to the next manufacturing step until the issue is resolved. This prevents the historical pattern of subcontracted work flowing silently into inventory only to be discovered later during customer audits or field failures. Partial rework is tracked with complete traceability: if a heat treat job required re-processing, both the original execution and the rework are recorded and linked to the same lot, preserving the full history.

The scorecard system provides long-term visibility into subcontractor capability and performance. Over time, the system calculates which subcontractors consistently execute processes within specification, which hold valid NADCAP certifications for specific process types, and what rework rates each subcontractor generates. These metrics enable manufacturers to make informed decisions about which subcontractors to trust with critical work and to identify performance trends requiring intervention. For manufacturers managing customers with rigorous traceability requirements (aerospace, pharma, medical device), the system automatically generates audit-ready subcontractor work reports compliant with AS9100: process specification, actual parameters used with timestamps, equipment serial numbers and calibration status, operator certification status at time of execution, completion date, and photographs of finished components—all in a single document that satisfies compliance requirements.

How It Works

flowchart TD A[Manufacturer Initiates
Work Order] --> B[Define Process
Specifications] B --> C[Select & Verify
Subcontractor Cert] C --> D[Transmit to
Subcontractor Portal] D --> E[Subcontractor
Acknowledges Job] E --> F[Verify Operator
Certifications] F --> G[Execute Process &
Capture Parameters] G --> H{Parameters
In Spec?} H -->|No| I[Alert & Log
Deviation] I --> J[Complete Processing
& Document] H -->|Yes| J J --> K[Subcontractor Photos
& Upload Records] K --> L[Ship to Manufacturer
with Documentation] L --> M[Receiving Inspection
Verification] M --> N{Acceptance
Check} N -->|Fail| O[Quarantine & Issue
Corrective Action] N -->|Pass| P[Update Subcontractor
Scorecard] O --> P P --> Q[Traceability Report
Generated]

Subcontractor Work Tracker ensures outside processing remains visible and traceable from work order issuance through receiving inspection, with real-time process parameter monitoring, operator certification verification, and automated compliance documentation.

The Technology

All solutions run on the IoTReady Operations Traceability Platform (OTP), designed to handle millions of data points per day with sub-second querying. The platform combines an integrated OLTP + OLAP database architecture for real-time transaction processing and powerful analytics.

Deployment options include on-premise installation, deployment on your cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), or fully managed IoTReady-hosted solutions. All deployment models include identical enterprise features.

OTP includes built-in backup and restore, AI-powered assistance for data analysis and anomaly detection, integrated business intelligence dashboards, and spreadsheet-style data exploration. Role-based access control ensures appropriate information visibility across your organization.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does a subcontractor work tracking system cost to implement? +
Implementation costs vary based on infrastructure and integration complexity. A basic system costs $45,000-$75,000 for initial setup, including platform license ($15,000-$25,000), integration with existing ERP systems ($20,000-$30,000), and staff training ($10,000-$20,000). Monthly operational costs run $2,500-$5,000 depending on user count and data volume. For manufacturers managing 50-100 subcontractors annually, the system typically pays for itself within 18-24 months through reduced rework (15-25% improvement), lower audit costs ($5,000-$15,000 annually), and eliminated compliance failures. Larger operations managing 500+ subcontract orders annually achieve ROI within 12-18 months.
What is the typical timeline to deploy subcontractor tracking across a supplier network? +
Deployment follows a phased approach: Phase 1 (4-6 weeks) covers system setup, key subcontractor onboarding, and pilot program with 2-3 suppliers. Phase 2 (6-8 weeks) expands to 25-30% of your supplier base with full process parameter monitoring. Phase 3 (8-12 weeks) completes rollout to 100% of subcontractors performing critical processes. Full network deployment typically takes 4-5 months for mid-size manufacturers (100-200 active suppliers). Mobile app deployment adds 2-3 weeks per subcontractor site for equipment integration and operator training. Organizations that implement a phased approach report 40% faster adoption compared to big-bang rollouts, with fewer integration issues and higher data quality from the start.
How much can subcontractor work tracking reduce rework and scrap costs? +
Real-time process parameter monitoring and operator certification verification reduce rework by 15-25% on average. Manufacturers report concrete improvements: heat treat rework drops from 8-12% to 2-4%, welding defects decrease from 6-10% to 1-3%, and plating rejection rates fall from 5-8% to 0.5-1.5%. For a manufacturer processing $5M annually in subcontract work with typical 10% rework rate ($500k losses), a 20% rework reduction saves $100,000 annually. Automated receiving inspection prevents 60-80% of defective work from entering inventory undetected, avoiding costly field failures and customer returns. Total savings (including prevented field failures) reach $150,000-$300,000 annually for mid-size operations, with larger manufacturers seeing $500,000+ in annual benefits.
How does a subcontractor tracking system ensure compliance with AS9100 and NADCAP requirements? +
The system maintains complete audit trails required by AS9100 (aerospace) and NADCAP (special processes) standards. Every process execution is recorded with: timestamp, process parameters (temperatures, times, chemistry), equipment serial numbers and calibration status, operator identity and certification level at time of execution, and photographic evidence. NADCAP-certified subcontractors can document process scope and limitations directly in the system. The system automatically generates audit-ready reports in AS9100-compliant format within minutes, including process specification, actual parameters with tolerances, personnel certifications, equipment records, and completion evidence. During customer audits, manufacturers can retrieve complete traceability reports for any subcontract lot processed in the past 7 years, reducing audit preparation time by 70% (from 40+ hours to 12 hours). Compliance documentation costs drop 60-70% because parameter data is captured automatically rather than manually transcribed.
What integration effort is required with existing ERP systems like SAP or NetSuite? +
Integration with SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, or ERPNext typically requires 40-80 hours of development, costing $3,000-$6,000. The system connects via standard ERP APIs to automatically send work orders and receive completion confirmations. SAP integration covers purchase order routing, material receipt, and quality inspection workflows. NetSuite customers can leverage REST APIs to sync work order status in real-time. ERPNext integration (open-source) requires minimal development (20-30 hours) using webhooks. Initial setup includes mapping your process types to ERP categories, defining parameter specifications, and configuring notification workflows. Most implementations use a hybrid approach: legacy systems continue managing financial transactions while the subcontractor tracker handles process visibility and compliance documentation. For companies running multiple ERPs (manufacturing at one facility, global operations elsewhere), the system provides a unified subcontractor portal regardless of backend systems.
How does real-time process parameter capture improve first-pass yield rates? +
Real-time capture enables immediate corrective action before scrap is created. When furnace temperature drifts 15°F below specification, both the subcontractor's quality manager and your quality engineer receive alerts within seconds, not after work completes. Operators can adjust parameters on-the-fly to bring work back in-spec. Historical data shows first-pass yield improves from 85-90% baseline to 95-98% with active parameter monitoring and operator guidance. For heat treat operations, this means processing 100 parts with 10-15 parts requiring rework (baseline) versus 2-5 parts requiring rework (optimized). Welding operations see similar improvements: certified welder data correlates with first-pass yield rates 4-6% higher than uncertified operators, enabling targeted training. Subcontractors who implement the system report 12-18 month payback from their perspective through reduced scrap and labor costs, creating alignment: they improve processes, you receive better quality, costs drop for both parties.
Can subcontractor work tracking integrate with quality management systems and MES? +
Yes, integration with existing MES (Manufacturing Execution System) and QMS platforms is standard. The system connects to Apriso, Dassault MES, GE Digital Predix, or custom MES via API webhooks or batch file exchange (CSV, JSON). Quality management system integration enables automatic linking of subcontracted lots to your internal quality inspection records. When a heat treat lot returns, receiving inspection results automatically populate the quality module, triggering customer notification if rejections occur. MES systems can block manufacturing steps if subcontract process documentation is incomplete or parameters are out-of-spec, preventing defective materials from entering production. Integration effort is typically 20-40 hours ($1,500-$3,000) depending on system maturity. Organizations with mature MES/QMS infrastructure see 35-45% faster quality decision-making and 60% reduction in quality-related production delays. For operations running legacy systems without APIs, the tracker functions as a standalone quality module with manual data bridges to existing systems.

Deployment Model

Rapid Implementation

2-4 week implementation with our proven tech stack. Get up and running quickly with minimal disruption.

Your Infrastructure

Deploy on your servers with Docker containers. You own all your data with perpetual license - no vendor lock-in.

Ready to Get Started?

Let's discuss how Subcontractor Work Verification can transform your operations.

Schedule a Demo