Equipment Runtime Analytics
Track equipment runtime hours, start/stop cycles, and idle time. Predict maintenance needs based on actual usage patterns rather than calendar schedules.
Solution Overview
Track equipment runtime hours, start/stop cycles, and idle time. Predict maintenance needs based on actual usage patterns rather than calendar schedules. This solution is part of our Maintenance category and can be deployed in 2-4 weeks using our proven tech stack.
Industries
This solution is particularly suited for:
The Need
Manufacturing, mining, and logistics operations deploy hundreds of pieces of equipment—CNC machines, excavators, conveyor systems, pumps, compressors, loaders, and vehicles—each with dramatically different utilization patterns. A CNC machine at a job shop runs 4-8 hours daily with frequent start/stop cycles, while a production line compressor runs 16+ hours daily at continuous load. Yet maintenance schedules treat all equipment identically: "Replace bearings every 12 months regardless of actual usage." This calendar-based approach is fundamentally broken. Equipment that runs 2 hours daily reaches its 12-month calendar date still in excellent condition with 80% of useful life remaining, but calendar maintenance requires replacement anyway, wasting $15,000-50,000 in premature part replacement and labor. Conversely, equipment that runs 20 hours daily with heavy loads reaches failure risk in 8 months, but calendar-based schedules don't flag it for urgent attention until month 11, causing catastrophic failures that shut down production for days.
The core problem is complete invisibility into actual equipment usage. Maintenance teams lack quantitative data answering fundamental questions: How many hours did Excavator #7 actually run this month? How many start/stop cycles did the compressor experience? What percentage of time was equipment idle versus actively operating? How does actual runtime compare across similar equipment in the fleet? Without this data, maintenance planning is guesswork. A facility with 50 rotating pieces of equipment might experience 3-5 catastrophic failures per year at random, unpredictable times, causing emergency repairs costing $200,000-800,000 annually in unplanned downtime, emergency labor premiums, and secondary damage. Predictive failure rates are impossible—maintenance teams cannot predict when the next failure will occur, making it impossible to pre-position spare parts, schedule preventive maintenance, or optimize workforce allocation.
The financial consequences compound across entire fleets. A mining operation with 40 haul trucks experiencing 8-12 unexpected failures annually spends $50,000-150,000 per failure (emergency repairs, parts, labor, lost production on critical path). Annual failure cost: $400,000-1,800,000. Meanwhile, another fleet using calendar-based maintenance is replacing equipment predictively during scheduled maintenance windows, experiencing only 1-2 unexpected failures annually at $50,000-150,000 each. The difference between data-driven usage-based maintenance and blind calendar-based maintenance is $300,000-1,600,000 annual savings per fleet. At a typical 25-35% cost of goods sold for mining companies, this translates to $1,200,000-6,400,000 annual revenue impact across multiple operational fleets.
Regulatory requirements add another pressure. MSHA (Mine Safety and Health Administration) mandates documentation of equipment monitoring and preventive maintenance for mining operations. OSHA requires proof of equipment maintenance preventing worker safety incidents. ISO 13372 (condition monitoring and diagnostics) recommends usage-based maintenance strategies for critical equipment. Auditors flag "calendar-based maintenance without usage correlation" as findings requiring remediation. The ideal solution continuously tracks equipment runtime hours, start/stop cycles, and idle periods; correlates actual usage patterns with maintenance intervals; predicts maintenance needs based on actual usage rather than calendar dates; and maintains compliance documentation proving maintenance was scheduled rationally based on quantitative usage data rather than arbitrary time intervals.
The Idea
An Equipment Runtime Analytics system transforms maintenance from arbitrary calendar-based schedules into rational, usage-based predictive maintenance that prevents failures and optimizes maintenance costs. The system continuously monitors equipment runtime hours, operating cycles, and idle periods, creating a detailed equipment utilization database that reveals actual usage patterns invisible to manual observation. The system deploys power/current sensors on equipment or integrates with equipment controllers (PLCs, inverters, telematics) that already track operating hours, providing a continuous stream of usage data: runtime hours, start/stop cycle counts, average load, peak load, idle percentage, and operating temperature.
Runtime tracking captures the fundamental metric of equipment wear: actual operating hours. Unlike calendar dates that remain constant regardless of equipment operation, runtime hours directly correlate to component degradation. A motor bearing deteriorates primarily due to mechanical stress during operation—each hour of operation at design load degrades bearing surfaces approximately 1/10,000 of bearing life. A bearing rated for 10,000 operating hours reaches end-of-life after 10,000 hours of actual operation, whether that occurs over 6 months (24/7 operation) or 3 years (8-hour daily operation). Calendar-based maintenance ignores this degradation relationship, but runtime-based maintenance aligns maintenance timing with actual component wear. The system correlates runtime hours with maintenance intervals: "Bearing A reached 8,500 operating hours (85% of 10,000-hour rated life), recommend replacement within 100 operating hours (approximately 1 week at current usage rate)" enables precise, efficient maintenance scheduling.
Cycle counting reveals another critical usage dimension. Equipment experiencing frequent start/stop cycles degrades faster than equipment operating continuously, even at identical runtime hours. A pump running continuously for 100 hours undergoes 1 thermal cycle (startup heating, runtime stabilization, shutdown cooling). A pump with 100 start/stop cycles undergoes 100 thermal cycles, causing differential thermal expansion/contraction stress in seals, bearings, and housing. Transmission fluid gets pulled through filter and cooler frequently, accelerating thermal degradation. Cycle counting tracks: "Loader transmission experienced 2,500 start/stop cycles this month (daily average 83 cycles); historical data shows transmission failure typically occurs at 20,000-25,000 cycles; predicted maintenance need in 8-10 months." Comparing equipment in the same fleet reveals utilization extremes: Loader A experienced 3,200 cycles/month, Loader B experienced 800 cycles/month—Loader A requires maintenance 3-4x more frequently despite calendar schedules treating them identically.
Load profiling distinguishes between light-duty and heavy-duty operation, revealing that identical runtime hours under different load conditions produce different wear rates. A compressor running at 20% load for 100 hours experiences different bearing stress than the same compressor running at 80% load for 100 hours. Sensor data capturing average load, peak load, and load distribution enables load-adjusted maintenance predictions. A haul truck that operates mostly on flat terrain at moderate load experiences different drivetrain wear than a haul truck operating in mountainous terrain at peak load. The system aggregates this data: "Truck A: 500 hours runtime, 35% average load, maintenance in 12 months. Truck B: 500 hours runtime, 75% average load, maintenance in 6 months despite identical runtime."
Idle time tracking reveals whether equipment is actually working or sitting unused. In mining, where haul trucks are often staged at mining faces waiting for loaders, trucks might be "deployed" but actually idle 40-60% of the time. In manufacturing, equipment might be powered on for 10 hours daily but only running for 6 hours due to changeovers, setup, and downtime. The system distinguishes active operating time from idle time: "Truck logged 10 hours powered on, but 4 hours was idle waiting for load, 1 hour was changeover, 5 hours actual productive haul time." This enables precise cost-per-productive-hour tracking and distinguishes equipment downtime from equipment wear.
The system performs trend analysis on historical usage patterns, identifying seasonal variations, operator-specific utilization differences, and changes in operational demands. Mining operations show seasonal patterns: "July through October peak extraction season shows 30% higher equipment utilization; November through March lower utilization; plan maintenance timing around seasonal peaks." Fleet utilization varies across operator shifts: "Night shift operators run equipment at 65% average load, day shift at 85% average load; night shift equipment requires 20% less frequent maintenance despite calendar schedules treating shifts identically." Changes in operational demands trigger maintenance adjustments: "New customer order requires 40% production increase; equipment utilization rising 15%; adjust maintenance scheduling forward 20% to account for accelerated wear."
Predictive analytics leverage historical usage and failure data to estimate time-to-failure based on current usage rates. Machine learning models identify the usage progression pattern preceding equipment failure: "For CAT 320 excavators in similar mining conditions, failure typically occurs at 18,000-22,000 operating hours; current excavator at 15,500 hours running at 800 hours/month usage rate suggests critical maintenance need in 3-4 months." These predictions improve with fleet-wide data: after monitoring 50 similar pieces of equipment, the system builds a failure signature: Excavators of this type operating at >750 hours/month experience 35% higher failure risk compared to excavators operating at <500 hours/month. This data enables proactive intervention: "This excavator entering high-utilization period; recommend intensive preventive maintenance now (estimated 300-hour cost) to prevent $150,000 failure downtime later."
The system generates maintenance work orders automatically based on usage thresholds and predictions, integrating with CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management Systems) and parts inventory systems. When a piece of equipment approaches maintenance threshold (80% of recommended operating hours between maintenance intervals), the system automatically generates work order: "Pump A reached 8,000 operating hours (80% of 10,000-hour recommended interval); maintenance required within 200 operating hours; recommend scheduling during next available 4-hour maintenance window; work order generated and assigned to Team B." Integration with parts inventory enables spare parts pre-positioning: "Pump bearing replacement required; currently 1 unit in stock, 0 units allocated; recommend ordering 2 additional units (3-week lead time) to maintain minimum 2-unit safety stock." For critical equipment, the system enforces minimum spare parts policies: "Critical Loader A pump bearing typically fails in high-utilization periods; maintain minimum 3 units in inventory (vs. standard 1 unit) during June-August peak season."
Real-time dashboards and mobile alerts enable rapid response to equipment entering failure risk zones. Color-coded fleet status shows green for equipment operating normally with ample remaining interval before maintenance, yellow for equipment approaching maintenance threshold, orange for equipment requiring urgent maintenance scheduling, red for equipment operating beyond safe maintenance intervals. Usage trend graphs show historical patterns enabling fleet managers to understand seasonal peaks and predict maintenance needs 2-3 months in advance. Mobile alerts notify fleet managers when equipment enters yellow or red zones, enabling coordination with production scheduling to minimize downtime impact. Historical usage data is maintained for each equipment asset, creating permanent equipment utilization genealogy supporting regulatory compliance audits, cost analysis, and warranty claims for equipment defects.
How It Works
Running or Idle] --> B[Power/Current Sensor
or PLC Integration] B --> C[Capture Runtime Hours
Cycles & Load] C --> D[Transmit Telemetry
with Timestamp] D --> E[Backend Receives
Equipment Usage Data] E --> F[Store in SQLite
Immutable Log] F --> G[Calculate Usage Metrics
Hours, Cycles, Load] G --> H{Approaching
Maintenance?} H -->|No| I[Equipment Operating
Normal Status] I --> T[Real-Time Dashboard
Green Status] H -->|Yes| J[Analyze Usage Pattern
vs Historical Data] J --> K[Correlate with
Failure Risk Model] K --> L{Maintenance
Status?} L -->|Predicted Failure
4-12 Weeks| M[Alert: Schedule
Maintenance] L -->|Urgent Failure
1-4 Weeks| N[Critical Alert:
Immediate Scheduling] M --> P[Run DuckDB
Analytics] N --> P P --> Q[Predict Time-to-Failure
Based on Usage Curve] Q --> R[Generate Maintenance
Work Order] R --> S[Update Parts
Inventory System] S --> U[Schedule Equipment
Maintenance] U --> V[Maintenance Performed
Equipment Serviced] V --> T F -.->|Historical Usage| P
Real-time equipment runtime analytics system that tracks operating hours, start/stop cycles, and load patterns; correlates actual usage with maintenance intervals; predicts maintenance needs based on usage-based wear progression rather than arbitrary calendar schedules; and enables data-driven maintenance scheduling to prevent failures and optimize maintenance costs.
The Technology
All solutions run on the IoTReady Operations Traceability Platform (OTP), designed to handle millions of data points per day with sub-second querying. The platform combines an integrated OLTP + OLAP database architecture for real-time transaction processing and powerful analytics.
Deployment options include on-premise installation, deployment on your cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), or fully managed IoTReady-hosted solutions. All deployment models include identical enterprise features.
OTP includes built-in backup and restore, AI-powered assistance for data analysis and anomaly detection, integrated business intelligence dashboards, and spreadsheet-style data exploration. Role-based access control ensures appropriate information visibility across your organization.
Frequently Asked Questions
Deployment Model
Rapid Implementation
2-4 week implementation with our proven tech stack. Get up and running quickly with minimal disruption.
Your Infrastructure
Deploy on your servers with Docker containers. You own all your data with perpetual license - no vendor lock-in.
Related Solutions
Bearing Temperature Monitoring
IoT temperature sensors on rotating equipment with alert thresholds. Predict bearing failures before catastrophic downtime occurs.
Oil Analysis Trending
Track oil analysis tests from equipment with trending of particle counts, viscosity, and contamination. Alert when trending indicates imminent failure.
Vibration Analysis Tracking
Capture vibration measurements during PM checks with trending dashboards. Alert when vibration increases above baseline indicating wear.
Ready to Get Started?
Let's discuss how Equipment Runtime Analytics can transform your operations.
Schedule a Demo