🔐

Data Integrity Audit (21 CFR Part 11)

Automated audit trail of all system changes, user actions, and data modifications for FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance reporting.

Solution Overview

Automated audit trail of all system changes, user actions, and data modifications for FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance reporting. This solution is part of our Compliance category and can be deployed in 2-4 weeks using our proven tech stack.

Industries

This solution is particularly suited for:

Pharma Healthcare Food & Beverage

The Need

Pharmaceutical manufacturers, medical device companies, and healthcare providers face an inescapable regulatory requirement: prove that every data entry, modification, and deletion was performed by an authorized person with legitimate business justification. FDA 21 CFR Part 11 (electronic records, electronic signatures) and the ALCOA+ principles (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate, plus Complete, Consistent, Enduring, and Available) form the foundation of data integrity compliance, yet most organizations lack the systematic controls to demonstrate these principles are embedded in their operations. A single audit finding that data was modified without proper documentation or authorization can result in FDA Warning Letters, product seizures, mandatory recalls, and market access suspension. The financial impact is catastrophic: a pharma company can lose FDA approval for an entire product line, costing $100M+ in lost revenue, plus potential civil penalties that scale with company size and violation severity. Medical device companies face similar consequences, with the FDA increasingly targeting data integrity violations as a top enforcement priority. EU Annex 11 (computerized systems compliance) adds additional requirements for system validation, change management, and audit trail preservation, creating a global compliance framework that manufacturers cannot ignore.

The regulatory landscape has fundamentally shifted in the past 5 years. The FDA's 2022 draft guidance on data integrity explicitly states that companies must implement automated controls to prevent unauthorized changes, detect tampering, and maintain immutable evidence of all modifications. Manual spreadsheet-based controls, isolated audit logs from different systems, and administrator-only access to change documentation are no longer acceptable. Regulators expect systematic, technology-enabled data integrity controls integrated into core business processes. The problem is compounded by the reality that data modifications occur across multiple systems: manufacturing execution systems (MES), laboratory information management systems (LIMS), enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, and custom applications. Data integrity is not a single audit trail—it requires a comprehensive ecosystem of controls, change tracking, access logging, and automated verification that most organizations cannot implement with legacy systems designed before data integrity requirements existed.

The operational consequence is pervasive: compliance teams spend hundreds of hours manually assembling audit evidence from disparate systems to prepare for regulatory inspections. When a regulator asks "Who authorized this critical process parameter change?" or "Can you prove this lot release decision was made by a qualified person?", the company cannot produce systematic evidence. Instead, they assemble emails, system logs from different platforms, paper signatures, and electronic signatures from different systems into a patchwork audit file. This process is error-prone, incomplete, and ultimately unconvincing to regulators who expect integrated, systematic evidence of data integrity controls. The financial impact extends beyond audit findings: the cost of remediation after a Warning Letter or inspection with significant findings can reach $500k-$2M, including consultant fees, system upgrades, retraining, and lost production time during investigations. For companies that have already experienced audit failures, the reputational impact with customers and investors can be severe, directly impacting business growth and valuation.

The Idea

A Data Integrity Audit system transforms data integrity from a reactive compliance scramble into a proactive, continuous assurance program built into operations. The system implements ALCOA+ principles by design: every data entry is automatically attributed to a specific, authenticated user; every modification is timestamped with contemporaneous precision (microsecond granularity with timezone awareness); every change is documented with the business reason for the modification; and all of this evidence is preserved in immutable, tamper-proof logs that can be produced at audit time. Unlike manual audit trails bolted onto systems after deployment, this system embeds data integrity controls into the core architecture of manufacturing and quality operations.

The system works by intercepting all data modifications at the point of entry. When a manufacturing technician releases a production batch, enters a quality test result, or modifies a process parameter, the system captures the complete context in real-time: who performed the action (authenticated user identity, employee ID, role), when (precise timestamp with timezone), what was changed (before value, after value, field modified), why (business reason or approval reference from the authorization workflow), and how (type of authentication, MFA status, device/terminal used). This data is immediately written to an append-only audit log in immutable storage that cannot be modified, deleted, or corrupted by normal application operations. The audit log entry is cryptographically signed using SHA-256 hashing and hash chaining: each entry's hash includes the hash of the previous entry, creating a tamper-evident chain where modifying any entry would immediately break the chain and reveal tampering.

For critical actions requiring FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance (batch release, quality approval, deviation authorization, deviation closure), the system implements electronic signature capture at the point of action. Electronic signatures are cryptographically bound to the audit log entry and the specific data modification being authorized. Unlike traditional username/password authentication which proves identity, electronic signatures prove both identity and intent: "This person intentionally authorized this specific change." The system integrates with digital signature providers (DocuSign, Adobe Sign, or local smartcard systems) to capture legal-grade signatures with non-repudiation properties. When an FDA inspector asks "Can you prove a qualified person authorized the release of this batch?", the company produces the digitally signed audit log entry with cryptographic proof of signature, demonstrating ALCOA+ compliance.

The system provides role-based access control at the data integrity level. Manufacturing operators can see audit logs for data they entered, but cannot view logs from other areas. Supervisors can see audit logs for their team's data. Quality assurance teams have read-only access to all data modifications affecting product quality. Lab directors can filter audit trails by lot number or test parameter. Importantly, even system administrators cannot directly access or modify audit logs without triggering detective controls. Any access to sensitive audit data is itself logged in a protected audit trail, creating accountability for who reviewed evidence. The system generates regulatory-ready reports automatically: FDA 21 CFR Part 11 reports showing all electronic records and signatures, ALCOA+ compliance reports demonstrating every principle is met, change summary reports organized by process area or lot number, and deviation closure evidence reports linking authorized changes to deviation investigations. These reports are signed and timestamped, creating defensible compliance evidence ready for regulatory inspection.

For data integrity verification and early problem detection, the system implements continuous monitoring and automated verification. The system monitors all data entries in real-time and flags anomalies: duplicate entries from the same user in short time windows (potential copy-paste errors), data entries outside normal ranges for that process parameter (potential keying errors), modifications without corresponding approval evidence (compliance violations), and access to sensitive data by unusual user-role combinations. Weekly automated verification checks the integrity of all audit trails: hash chain verification confirms no entries have been modified, archive verification confirms historical data has been preserved, access control verification confirms unauthorized persons have not accessed sensitive audit trails. If any integrity issues are detected, the system immediately alerts compliance and IT personnel with detailed evidence. The system maintains an integrity verification report that documents when checks were performed and whether they passed, creating ongoing evidence of data integrity control effectiveness.

The system stores historical data in immutable archives to satisfy retention requirements and prevent tampering. Audit logs older than configurable periods (e.g., 90 days in production, 5 years for archival) are exported to write-once cloud storage (AWS S3 with Object Lock, Google Cloud Storage with retention policies) or write-once tape systems where deletion is technically impossible. The system maintains an index of archived data and can quickly retrieve and present historical evidence when needed. For medical device companies subject to FDA 21 CFR Part 11.10(e) requirements, this architecture ensures compliance with requirements for data generation, accuracy, completeness, security, and preservation. For pharma companies subject to FDA data integrity guidance and ICH Q9 quality risk management principles, this system provides documented evidence supporting quality decision-making and risk-based controls. For healthcare organizations subject to HIPAA requirements, this system provides complete access logs and modification history for patient records, with the ability to quickly respond to breach investigation requests.

How It Works

flowchart TD A[User Action:
Release Batch] --> B{Authenticate
User Identity} B --> C[Capture ALCOA+
Context] C --> D{Critical Action
Requiring Signature?} D -->|Yes| E[Request Electronic
Signature] D -->|No| F[Log to
Append-Only Store] E --> G[Sign with
Digital Certificate] G --> F F --> H[Hash Entry +
Hash Chain] H --> I[Write to
SQLite Audit Log] I --> J{Tampering
Detected?} J -->|No| K[Archive to
Immutable Cloud] J -->|Yes| L[Alert Security
Team]

Data integrity audit system with ALCOA+ context capture, electronic signatures for critical actions, hash chain tampering detection, and automated regulatory reporting for FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11 compliance.

The Technology

All solutions run on the IoTReady Operations Traceability Platform (OTP), designed to handle millions of data points per day with sub-second querying. The platform combines an integrated OLTP + OLAP database architecture for real-time transaction processing and powerful analytics.

Deployment options include on-premise installation, deployment on your cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), or fully managed IoTReady-hosted solutions. All deployment models include identical enterprise features.

OTP includes built-in backup and restore, AI-powered assistance for data analysis and anomaly detection, integrated business intelligence dashboards, and spreadsheet-style data exploration. Role-based access control ensures appropriate information visibility across your organization.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ALCOA+ compliance and why does it matter for my pharmaceutical company? +
ALCOA+ is the FDA's framework for ensuring data integrity: Attributable (who made the change), Legible (can be read and understood), Contemporaneous (recorded in real-time), Original (not copied or transferred), Accurate (correct and complete), plus Complete, Consistent, Enduring, and Available. ALCOA+ compliance is not optional—it's a regulatory requirement under FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ICH Q14 guidance. Companies that cannot demonstrate ALCOA+ compliance risk FDA Warning Letters, product seizures, and market access suspension. Our system implements ALCOA+ by design: every data modification is automatically attributed to an authenticated user, timestamped with microsecond precision, captured with full context (why, when, by whom, what was changed), and stored in immutable, tamper-proof logs that prove the original entry was never modified.
How can I prove I have data integrity controls during an FDA inspection? +
During an FDA inspection, regulators expect you to produce systematic, documentary evidence that your organization has implemented continuous data integrity controls—not manual spreadsheets or patchwork evidence assembled after the fact. Our system automatically generates FDA-ready compliance reports organized by lot number, time period, operator, or change type. These reports show every electronic record created under 21 CFR Part 11, every electronic signature applied to critical actions, and complete audit trails demonstrating each ALCOA+ principle is met. The reports themselves are timestamped and signed, creating defensible evidence that has not been modified. When an FDA inspector asks 'Who authorized this batch release?' or 'Can you prove this deviation closure was approved by a qualified person?', you produce the digitally signed audit log entry with cryptographic proof. This systematic approach convinces regulators that data integrity is embedded in your operations, not bolted on afterward.
What's the difference between regular audit logs and a proper data integrity audit system? +
Standard audit logs from manufacturing systems are reactive, incomplete, and vulnerable to tampering. They might show that data was changed, but often lack context (why?), proper authentication (who really made the change?), or tamper-proof storage. In contrast, our data integrity audit system is proactive, comprehensive, and tamper-evident. We capture the complete ALCOA+ context at the point of change: authenticated user identity (from your enterprise directory), precise timestamp with timezone and microsecond granularity, the before and after values for all modified fields, the business reason for the change, approval status and approver identity if required, IP address and device for access tracking, and authentication method (password, MFA, smartcard). All of this is written to an immutable, append-only audit log that cannot be modified or deleted through normal operations. The entries are cryptographically protected using SHA-256 hash chaining, where each entry's hash includes the previous entry's hash, creating a tamper-evident chain where modifying any entry immediately breaks the chain. If a regulator asks for evidence that a process parameter was not altered without authorization, you prove it by verifying the hash chain is unbroken.
Can your system integrate with our existing MES, LIMS, or ERP systems? +
Yes. Our data integrity audit system is designed to work with the systems you already have. We integrate with popular manufacturing platforms through either API integrations or database change data capture (CDC). We support leading MES platforms, LIMS solutions, and ERP systems including SAP, Oracle, and NetSuite. Our integration framework accommodates both enterprise systems and customized legacy platforms. When a data modification occurs in any connected system—whether a technician releases a batch in MES, a lab analyst enters a test result in LIMS, or a quality manager updates a process parameter in ERP—our system captures that change in real-time, enriches it with context from the source system (user identity, department, system role), and logs it to a central audit trail. This becomes your system of record for evidence about who changed what, when, why, and with what authorization, even if your original systems don't have audit trails that satisfy regulators. Contact our sales team for specific integration support for your platform.
How do electronic signatures work for FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance? +
Electronic signatures under 21 CFR Part 11 are far more powerful than username/password authentication because they prove intent, not just identity. When a qualified person electronically signs a critical action (batch release, quality approval, deviation authorization), they are cryptographically signing that specific action with their digital certificate or smartcard. Unlike a password, which only proves someone knows your login credentials, an electronic signature proves the signer intentionally authorized that exact change. Our system captures electronic signatures according to FDA guidance: the meaning of the signature (what action is being signed), the signer's identity (name, employee ID, title), the date and time (precise timestamp), and the reason for the signature (business justification). We support multiple signature standards including PKIX X.509 certificates, smartcard-based signatures, and cloud-based services like DocuSign and Adobe Sign. The signature is cryptographically bound to the audit log entry and the data modification, so modifying either the entry or the signature would break the signature. When you present signed audit logs to an FDA inspector, you demonstrate non-repudiation: the signer cannot deny they authorized the action because the signature proves they used their private key.
How long do I need to keep audit trail data, and how do you handle long-term storage? +
Regulatory retention requirements vary: FDA expects data to be kept for the shelf life of the product plus additional years (often 10+ years for pharmaceutical products), EU Annex 11 requires indefinite preservation of data affecting product quality, and HIPAA requires healthcare organizations to keep audit logs for the duration the record is in use plus 6 years (often lifetime retention for electronic health records). Our system handles long-term preservation by exporting historical audit logs to immutable cloud storage that technically prevents modification or deletion. We support AWS S3 with Object Lock (for indefinite retention), Google Cloud Storage with retention policies, and physical write-once tape systems. Logs older than configurable periods (e.g., 90 days in production, 5 years for archival) are automatically exported to these immutable archives and cannot be modified or deleted once written. The system maintains an index of archived logs and can quickly retrieve specific entries or date ranges when needed. Every week, automated integrity verification checks that the hash chain for all current logs is unbroken and spot-checks archived logs to verify they haven't been tampered with. When a regulator asks for evidence from many years ago, you can quickly retrieve and present the complete, unmodified audit trail with verification that it has been protected continuously.
What happens if someone tries to tamper with the audit log? How would you detect it? +
Our system is designed so that tampering is virtually impossible and immediately detectable. Every audit log entry is protected with SHA-256 hashing and hash chaining: each entry's hash is computed from that entry's data plus the hash of the previous entry, creating a chain where each link depends on the integrity of all previous links. If someone modifies an entry, its hash changes, which breaks the hash of the next entry, which breaks the hash of the following entry, creating a cascade of detectable corruption. System administrators cannot access or modify audit logs directly—even their access must go through the audit system itself and creates a log entry. If anyone attempts to modify an entry, delete an entry, or tamper with the hash chain, the integrity verification automatically detects it. Our system performs automated integrity verification weekly (configurable), recomputing the expected hash for each entry and comparing to the stored hash. If any discrepancy is detected, immediate alerts go to your compliance and IT security teams with detailed evidence of what was changed and when. We also spot-check archived logs to verify they have not been tampered with during long-term storage. This multi-layered approach ensures that audit trails remain trustworthy evidence suitable for regulatory inspection.

Deployment Model

Rapid Implementation

2-4 week implementation with our proven tech stack. Get up and running quickly with minimal disruption.

Your Infrastructure

Deploy on your servers with Docker containers. You own all your data with perpetual license - no vendor lock-in.

Related Articles

View All Articles

Ready to Get Started?

Let's discuss how Data Integrity Audit (21 CFR Part 11) can transform your operations.

Schedule a Demo